Logo-doh
Depiction of Health. 2015;6(1): 25-30.
  Abstract View: 804
  PDF Download: 398

Quality of Health Care Delivery

Original Article

Assessing Delivered Services Quality in Emergency Department of Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran: 2011

Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi, Hadi Kalantari*, Alireza Ala, Mahboub Pouraghayee, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Kamal Gholipoor, Ali taghizadiye, Rezaghli Vahidi
*Corresponding Author: Email: hadi.bm20@gmail.com

Abstract

Background and objectives: The satisfaction of emergency department (ED) patients is considered as an important indicator of hospitals quality. This study aimed to evaluate service quality (SQ) from patients’ perspective in ED.

Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 120 admitted patients in emergency department of Imam Reza hospital of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in 2011. Service Quality was measured using researcher-developed questionnaire. Questionnaire content validity was reviewed and confirmed by 10 experts and its reliability was confirmed based on Cronbach's alpha index (α = 0. 827). A measure of service quality was derived by combining the relative importance and actual performance of ED staffs. Service Quality was calculated using SQ = 10–(Importance×Performance). Independent Samples Test and Analysis of Variance were conducted to compare SQ score between categorical variables. Data were analyzed using the SPSS-17 statistical package.

Results: From the customers’ point of view, the average service quality score was 8.77 of 10. Furthermore, confidentiality, dignity and availability achieved the highest and of nutritional services, safety, cost and continuity of care got the lowest SQ scores from the patients’ perspective.

Conclusion : Improving quality of delivered care in ED depends on the understanding of the current situation and its weaknesses. It is possible to improve quality of delivered care by implementing effective interventions according to the results of study findings and by considering focus on dimensions which have worst quality.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 805

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 398

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

ePublished: 26 May 2015
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)