Logo-doh
Depiction of Health. 2016;7(1): 18-26.
  Abstract View: 723
  PDF Download: 190

Quality of Health Care Delivery

Original Article

Quality Evaluation of Emergency Department Services of Nemazee Hospital from the Patients’ Viewpoint

Jamshid Bahmei*, Hamed Rahimi, Iman Rahgoshay, Zahra Kavosi
*Corresponding Author: Email: jamshid_b1388@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background and objectives : The main mission of the hospitals in the health system is to provide quality care for patients and fulfilling their needs and expectations. This study was conducted with the aim of quality evaluation of emergency department services from patients’ viewpoint in Shiraz Nemazee hospital.

Material and Methods : This was an analytic descriptive study performed as cross sectional in 2014-2015. The population of this study consisted of all the patients admitted to the emergency department of Nemazee hospital. Sample size was determined 582 patients with simple sampling method. Data were collected through SERVQUAL questionnaire. Questionnaire validity was confirmed using experts’ opinion and factor analysis and its reliability was confirmed 87% using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The questionnaire measured quality gap in six dimensions including: tangibles, reliability, assurance, empathy, responsiveness and access to services. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and applying descriptive statistics tests, paired t-test, independent t-test and One-way analysis variance.

Results : The results showed that the biggest and smallest gaps in the studied dimensions were as follows: assurance (-0/55±0/86), responsiveness (-0/31±0/98). There was a significant difference between expectations and perceptions in tangibles, reliability and access to services dimensions (P>0/05) and there was no significant difference in responsiveness, assurance and empathy dimensions (P<0/05).

Conclusion : The quality of services in the emergency department of the hospital was suitable but significant quality gaps in some aspects in the hospital suggest that managers need to pay more attention to quality improvement programs to provide patients more satisfaction.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 724

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 190

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 15 Mar 2016
Accepted: 03 Apr 2016
ePublished: 19 Jun 2016
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)