Logo-doh
Submitted: 20 Sep 2025
Revision: 08 Nov 2025
Accepted: 10 Dec 2025
ePublished: 29 Dec 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Depiction of Health. 2025;16(4): 450-455.
doi: 10.34172/doh.2025.35
  Abstract View: 30
  PDF Download: 19

Health Information and Library Science

Perspectives

Reviewers' Burnout and Challenges of Peer Review in Scientific Journals

Sara Jalalzadeh 1* ORCID logo

1 TUOMS Press Office, Health Informatics and Scientific Resources, Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: Sarajalalzadeh62@gmail.com

Abstract

The peer review process is a key scientific indicator that differentiates scientific journals from other publications, thereby validating the research findings published within them. Today, scientific publishers are facing a dual challenge: the surge in scientific production and article submissions on the one hand, and the crisis of reviewer fatigue and burnout on the other. This trend can lead to significant challenges within the journal review system and the emergence of ethical misconduct in peer review. The crisis of reviewer burnout and the reluctance to review is considered a critical global challenge and an alarm bell for the scientific integrity and existence of journals.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 30

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 19

Your browser does not support the canvas element.